System for alkylation process analysis

ABSTRACT

Closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process is provided by an analyzer including an instrument configured for measuring a property of the liquid mixture, and having responsivities to concentrations of one of the components, independent of concentrations of others of the components. A temperature detector generates temperature data for the liquid mixture, and a processor captures data generated by the temperature detector and the instrument, and uses the data in combination with a model of responsivities to various concentrations of the components at various temperatures, to determine a temperature compensated concentration of the components while the liquid mixture flows continuously through the analyzer. A process control module including a process model of the hydrocarbon process, is coupled to the analyzer and is couplable to the hydrocarbon process, to receive the temperature compensated concentration and to generate at least one output configured to affect operation of the hydrocarbon process.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/720,533 entitled System and Method for Alkylation Process Analysis, filed on Mar. 9, 2010 now U.S Pat. 7,972,863, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/509,212 entitled System and Method for Alkylation Process Analysis, filed on Jul. 24, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/084,142 entitled Multi-Property Measurement, filed on Jul. 28, 2008, the contents each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

This invention relates to chemical analysis, and more particularly to alkylation process analysis and control.

2. Background Information

Introduction to the Refining Alkylation Market

Between a quarter and a third of the world's refineries operate alkylation units, which convert relatively low-value byproducts of the crude oil refining process into alkylate, a high octane component used to make gasoline. Among the numerous control variables that determine the economics of alkylation is the composition of the acid catalyst. Globally, the number of alkylation units using hydrofluoric acid (HF) is currently about 125 versus about 90 using sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄ or SA). Slightly more than half of all alkylation units in the world are located in North America, where gasoline is favored over diesel as a motor fuel for passenger cars and alkylate is accordingly a valued blending component.

Another important application of alkylation technology is in the production of LABs (linear alkyl benzenes), important as a raw material used in laundry detergents. However, the total number of alkylation units in operation to produce LABs, as well as tonnage produced, is rather small compared with the refining industry.

Alkylation Process Control

Alkylate is one of the most important gasoline blending components in the refining industry. Because it has an extremely high octane number, contains virtually no sulfur, and can be produced using olefinic by-products from the fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) unit, alkylate has been called refiners' gold. Given that the reactants are seldom pure, and that propylene is sometimes mixed with the olefin feed, alkylate in practice comprises a mixture of compounds instead of pure isooctane as depicted in the following idealized equation: Isobutane+Isobutene→3,3,5-trimethylpentane (Isooctane)

Produced in a continuous-flow process, the chemical addition of isobutane and isobutene is effected conventionally through liquid phase catalysis involving strong acids such as hydrofluoric acid (HF) and sulfuric Acid (H₂SO₄, or SA), although solid phase catalysts are currently under development.

Monitoring and controlling the composition of the liquid acid catalyst, i.e., acid strength and the levels of impurities that dilute the acid, are among the most important challenges associated with the profitable operation of the alkylation process. One important impurity is water, which enters the process with the feed streams. Though present at ppm (parts per million) levels, water accumulates in acid catalyst at percent levels due to feed rates ranging from a few thousand barrels per day (bpd) to tens of thousands of bpd. By contrast, acid soluble oil (ASO, as defined hereinbelow) accumulates in the acid catalyst, a by-product of reactions involving feed impurities that contain sulfur, oxygen, or conjugated double bonds.

HF Alkylation

In the case of HF alkylation (HFA), water generally is controlled at levels below 2% to minimize corrosion of equipment in the unit. Also, total hydrocarbons dissolved in the catalyst are typically held at levels around 11%-16% to yield alkylate of the required quality and maximize process economics. In HFA, HF strength is controlled through acid regeneration within the alkylation unit, which is essentially a distillation process that separates HF from the higher-boiling impurities, H₂O and ASO (Acid Soluble Oil, as defined hereinbelow).

If HF strength drops below about 80%, side reactions can accelerate and lead to a condition called acid runaway, which consumes HF and produces large amounts of ASO. Such runaways rarely occur, as unit operators usually have time to detect the incipient runaway and “pull charge” (withhold olefin feed) to stop the process before the runaway condition actually occurs. However, this action also stops the production of alkylate while the catalyst is regenerated. Furthermore, acid regeneration itself has associated costs including energy required to run the unit, neutralization and disposal of hydrocarbon byproducts, and the addition of fresh, pure HF. Thus, the ability to monitor and control catalyst composition in real time allows refiners to avert runaways, reducing operating costs while also tending to maximize product quality (octane), throughput, and the time between maintenance shutdowns to repair or replace corroded components.

SA Alkylation

SA alkylation (SAA) differs from HFA in that the catalyst generally is not, with rare exception, regenerated on site at the refinery. HF has a relatively low boiling point and can be distilled. By contrast, SA is essentially non-volatile and therefore cannot be purified through distillation. Rather the “spent” acid generally must be shipped by rail car for remote processing. Thus, the high cost associated with off-site regeneration partially offsets the perceived safety advantage of SA over HF, i.e., its low volatility.

Given that the alkylation reaction occurs only when acid strength is sufficiently high to catalyze the reaction of isobutane with olefins, the effectiveness of SA diminishes when its strength falls below a certain level due to accumulation of ASO and H₂O—typically around 88%-90%. Thus, the economics of SA alkylation depend on knowing exactly the point where SA becomes too weak and must be taken out of service. For example, taking SA out of service when its strength is 89% may be very costly if good quality alkylate can be produced economically with acid strength ≧88.5%.

Traditional Analysis of Acid Catalyst

The composition of acid catalyst is typically determined by manually obtaining a sample for analysis in the local refinery laboratory daily, weekly, or several times each week. In contrast with hydrocarbon samples routinely analyzed in the refinery lab, full analysis of acid catalyst samples tends not to be straightforward due to special requirements for sample handling, preparation, and analysis. Additionally, HF presents a safety hazard due to its volatility and toxicity. With both HF and SA, comprehensive determination of composition is difficult for at least two reasons. First, measurement of water generally depends on a Karl Fischer titration method specially modified to neutralize the strong acid. Second, ASO is not a single compound, but includes a range of chemically-related compounds that have a rather wide range of molecular weights and boiling points, some of which (e.g., “light ASO”) can evaporate rapidly at room temperature.

Analysis Frequency

In consideration of the foregoing difficulties, refiners may test the acid as infrequently as possible to minimize laboratory workload. Some refiners make do with one analysis per week while refineries operating in Los Angeles County, CA may be required by regulation to test HF catalyst once every 8 hours. Infrequent analysis may be sufficient to permit process control under stable operating conditions, but not to identify rapid changes caused by occasional surges in feed impurities that lead to generation of ASO.

Analytical Reproducibility and Completeness

Compounding the issue of analysis frequency, laboratory test results may not always be reliable due to the difficulty of obtaining a representative sample when sample volumes are minimized in consideration of safety, as may be done in the case of HF catalyst. This further compounds the difficulty of reproducibly executing the test method itself. And if technicians running the tests do not routinely perform the Karl Fischer water measurement, acid strength measured by titration may be the only parameter known in regard to catalyst composition, severely limiting operators'ability to optimize the process.

Safety

As mentioned, HF is both volatile and toxic. Sampling, sample handling, and testing therefore are executed in accordance with audited procedures carefully designed to ensure the safety of operators and technicians. In the case of HF, testing frequency may be deliberately suppressed to minimize exposure risks.

All of this underscores the undesirability of manual methods for routine analysis. Attempts have been made to replace manual sampling and testing with online measurement techniques, to facilitate the efficient and safe operation of alkylation units. To date, however, these attempts have generally been unsatisfactory, e.g., due to incomplete or inaccurate measurements by simple univariate instruments; or due to excessive complexity, lower-than-desired reliability and/or relatively high costs, such as associated with conventional use of spectrometric technologies. Thus, a need exists for an improved analyzer system for real-time alkylation process analysis and control.

SUMMARY

According to one aspect of the invention, an apparatus is provided for closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process having at least one liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing therethrough, which liquid hydrocarbon mixture includes an unknown concentration of components including hydrocarbons. The apparatus includes an analyzer having a fluid flow path configured to convey the liquid mixture continuously in a downstream direction from the hydrocarbon process. The analyzer includes an instrument disposed along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring a property of the liquid mixture, the instrument configured to have responsivities to concentrations of one of the components, substantially independent of the concentrations of others of the components. A temperature detector is configured to generate temperature data for the liquid mixture; and a processor is configured to capture data generated by the temperature detector and the instrument, and to use the data in combination with a model of responsivities to various concentrations of the components at various temperatures, to determine a temperature compensated concentration of the components in the liquid mixture while the liquid mixture flows continuously through the fluid flow path. A process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process, is communicably coupled to the analyzer and is communicably couplable to the hydrocarbon process. The PCM is configured to receive the temperature compensated concentration from the analyzer as an input to the process model, and to generate at least one output configured to affect operation of, and receivable by, the hydrocarbon process.

In another aspect of the invention, an apparatus is provided for closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process having at least one liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing therethrough, which liquid hydrocarbon mixture includes an unknown concentration of at least three components including hydrocarbons and water. The apparatus includes a fluid flow path configured to convey the liquid mixture continuously in a downstream direction therethrough. A Raman spectrometer is disposed along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring a first property of the liquid mixture. A separator is disposed upstream of the Raman spectrometer along the fluid flow path, the separator configured to remove hydrocarbon present in a gas or liquid phase distinct from that of the liquid mixture, wherein the liquid mixture is conveyed continuously through the Raman spectrometer. The Raman spectrometer is configured to have responsivities to concentration of one of the components, substantially independent of the concentration of the water. A conductivity sensor is located along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring conductivity of the liquid mixture, the Raman spectrometer and the conductivity sensor having mutually distinct responsivities to levels of the components. A processor is configured for capturing data generated by the Raman spectrometer and conductivity sensor and using the data in combination with a model of responsivities to various levels of the components at various temperatures to determine temperature compensated levels of the properties in the liquid mixture while the liquid mixture flows continuously through the fluid flow path. A process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process, is communicably coupled to the analyzer and communicably couplable to the hydrocarbon process. The PCM is configured to receive the temperature compensated concentration from the analyzer as an input to the process model, and to generate at least one output configured to affect operation of, and receivable by, the hydrocarbon process.

In yet another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process having at least one liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing therethrough. The method includes supplying the liquid mixture continuously in a downstream direction along a fluid flow path to a first instrument configured to have responsivities to concentrations of one or more of the components substantially independent of the concentrations of other components. The liquid mixture is supplied to a temperature detector and to a second instrument configured to have responsivities to another of the components, wherein the first and second instruments are configured to have mutually distinct responsivities to concentrations of the components. Properties of the liquid mixture are measured using the first and second instrument, and data generated by the first and second instruments and the temperature detector is captured. Using the data in combination with a model of responsivities to various concentrations of the components at various temperatures, a processor generates a temperature compensated concentration of the components in the liquid mixture, while the liquid mixture flows continuously through the fluid flow path. The temperature compensated concentration of components is inputted to a process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process. The PCM generates at least one output configured to affect operation of the hydrocarbon process.

In still another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process having at least one liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing therethrough. The method includes supplying the liquid mixture to at least first and second instruments having mutually distinct responsivities to levels of the components, at least one of the instruments being a Raman spectrometer and the other being a conductivity sensor. The liquid mixture is supplied to the Raman spectrometer through a separator configured to remove hydrocarbon present in a gas or liquid phase distinct from that of the liquid mixture, wherein the liquid mixture is conveyed continuously through the Raman spectrometer. First and second properties of the liquid mixture are measured using the first and second instruments, to generate data which is captured and used in combination with a model of responsivities to various levels of the components at various temperatures, to determine levels of the components in the liquid mixture. Temperature compensated concentrations of the components are inputted to a process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process. The PCM generates at least one output configured to affect operation of the hydrocarbon process.

The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a plot of an NIR spectrum of HF Alkylation Catalyst;

FIG. 2 is a plot of an NMR spectrum of Sulfuric Acid Alkylation Catalyst;

FIG. 3 is a plot of component concentrations in HF catalyst versus time;

FIG. 4 is a plot of percent hydrocarbon versus percent HF in alkylation catalyst;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of an acid catalyst analyzer of the present invention, with optional portions shown in phantom;

FIGS. 6 and 7 are views similar to that of FIG. 5, of optional embodiments of acid catalyst analyzers of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram showing calibration of embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram showing validation of property measurements generated by embodiments of the present invention;

FIGS. 10-12 are schematic diagrams of alternate embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a table of various hydrocarbon streams and their components, which may be analyzed by embodiments of the present invention; and

FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram of yet another embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized. It is also to be understood that structural, procedural and system changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, well-known structures, circuits and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents. For clarity of exposition, like features shown in the accompanying drawings are indicated with like reference numerals and similar features as shown in alternate embodiments in the drawings are indicated with similar reference numerals.

General Overview

This disclosure describes a system and method for (e.g., online) composition measurement of acid catalyst and other hydrocarbon streams used in alkylation units of the type currently operating in roughly 30% of the world's oil refineries. Compared with available technologies such as conventional GC (gas chromatography), NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy, and NIR (near infrared) spectroscopy embodiments of the present invention substantially satisfy requirements for broad adoption by refiners globally: ease of implementation, analytical reliability (accuracy), operational reliability (low maintenance), and cost-effectiveness. Particular embodiments do so by combining two or more relatively low-cost sensor devices that tend to be both simple and inexpensive compared with conventional spectrometers. As will be discussed in greater detail hereinbelow, examples of such relatively low-cost sensor devices include, but are not limited to, the Foxboro 871FT toroidal conductivity sensor and the CFS10 Coriolis flowmeter, both available from Invensys Systems, Inc. (Foxborough, Mass., USA). Other embodiments enable the use of spectrometers without the need for relatively complex and expensive isothermal sample conditioning.

Where used in this disclosure, the term “property” refers to chemical and/or physical characteristics of a material, independently of its relative concentration within a mixture. The terms “computer” and “processor” are meant to encompass a workstation, personal computer, personal digital assistant (PDA), wireless telephone, or any other suitable computing device including a microprocessor, a computer readable medium upon which computer readable program code (including instructions and/or data) may be disposed, and a user interface. The terms “data system” and “model” are intended to refer to a computer-related component, including hardware, software, and/or software in execution. For example, a model may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor including an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a mathematical equation or set of equations, a program, and a computer. Moreover, the various components may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. The terms “real-time” and “on-demand” refer to sensing and responding to external events nearly simultaneously (e.g., within milliseconds or microseconds) with their occurrence, or without intentional delay, given the processing limitations of the system and the time required to accurately respond to the inputs. As used herein, the term “acid catalyst” refers to a liquid mixture (e.g., single phase) including at least an acid (HF or SA), water, and dissolved hydrocarbon (ASO). In some cases, the acid catalyst may also include an additive, e.g., for aerosol vapor suppression, etc. It is noted that the “acid strength” of the acid catalyst is commonly defined as the concentration of the acid, and while the acid can function as a catalyst on its own, as a practical matter, and as used herein, acid catalyst is understood to comprise the ternary (or quaternary) mixture. As used herein, the term “ASO” or “acid-soluble oil” refers to substantially any hydrocarbon dissolved within an acid, alone or in combination with additional hydrocarbon that may have been emulsified or otherwise mixed with acid in a liquid sample or on-line process. For example, the term ASO (or “polymer”) refers primarily to hydrocarbon that has been dissolved, emulsified or otherwise mixed with HF or SA to form to form a nominally single-phase mixture that persists as such during online sampling and analysis. By contrast, the acid catalyst sample may include entrained light hydrocarbon, believed to be substantially isobutane and possibly alkylate, in the form of phase-separated liquid or gas (IB/ps), which may be readily removed from the bulk acid catalyst by means of a device of suitable design (e.g., a separator).

Referring now to FIGS. 1-9, embodiments of the present invention will be more thoroughly described.

Criteria for an Online Analysis Solution

To overcome the issues of manual sampling and testing, the instant inventors have sought an online analytical methodology which is relatively straightforward to implement, reliable (mechanically robust with respect to acid), sufficiently accurate to support process optimization objectives, simple in overall design and operation, and cost-effective.

Additionally, installation of an online analyzer should not simply exchange one set of risks for another. For example, maintenance technicians who previously had no exposure to HF may be required to service an HF analyzer. Thus, solving the analytical problem should also enhance safety and reduce the overall risk of operator exposure.

A Question of Information Channels

Technologies that may be used with the embodiments disclosed herein generally fall into either of two classes: single-channel measurement instruments; and multi-channel spectrometers. The following Table 1 provides a representative comparison.

TABLE 1 Comparison of Technologies Applied for analysis of Alkylation Catalyst. INSTRUMENTS SPECTROMETERS DESCRIPTION Devices employing technology that Devices that measure a spectrum, responds directly and which in the general sense is a plot proportionately to variation in a of response (intensity) across a specific physical or chemical number of channels normally defined property in the sample, or measures in terms of frequency (or the response of such a property to a wavelength). The response is a stimulus that it applies to a sample. measure of the interaction of electromagnetic energy applied to the sample by the spectrometer at specific frequencies, or of the emission of energy by the sample in response to the application of electromagnetic energy. CHARACTERISTICS On the whole, instruments are Complex compared with instruments, simple, compact, have relatively low costing 20-50 times as much as cost, and generally require no instruments and usually requiring sample conditioning, but analyze a sample conditioning, e.g. to remove stream as presented. Instruments phase-separated water or generally are univariate devices that particulates or to provide tight supply a single channel of temperature control. Examples: NIR information in response to a specific (near infra-red) and NMR (nuclear chemical or physical change, but are magnetic resonance) spectroscopy. not suitable for measuring an effect By definition, spectrometers are that has two or more causes. multi-channel, multi-variable analyzers. CALIBRATION, Generally, the calibration is a simple Calibration normally relies on multi- MATHEMATICS mathematical function applied to the variable chemometrics to build instrument's output in response to a property models that are applied to physical or chemical property of the spectra of unknown samples for interest. Sometimes it is as simple property prediction. As a secondary as standardizing on two materials to or “referenced” methodology, define zero and span. The modeling requires a significant instrument stability is generally population of samples on which lab stable enough to permit this tests have been performed, and for calibration equation to be used for a which spectra have been measured. long period of time. EXAMPLES pH probes and ion-selective NIR, FTNIR (Fourier Transform NIR), electrodes; viscometers; refractive Raman, and NMR spectrometry index probes; beta gauges; densitometers; conductivity meters; simple photometers; flow meters; various water cut measurement technologies; temperature probes (RTDs) APPLIED TO THE Refractive Index FTNIR (for HF) ANALYSIS OF ACID Densitometry Process NMR (for H₂SO₄) CATALYST Conductivity LIMITATION Univariate data High cost; sampling system (too little information: complexity (to control temperature); one equation but three unknowns) installation complexity (fiber optics for NIR)

Individual instruments referenced above are relatively simple, low cost, easy to implement, and functionally reliable but have heretofore generally been incapable of providing all the desired information at the desired analytical accuracy. Spectrometers as conventionally used tend to be relatively high cost, complex, more difficult to implement and maintain than instruments, but have generally been able to provide the desired information.

As such, both classes of technology, as conventionally used, tend to offer poor value in applications such as alkylation catalyst analysis—instruments because they are inexpensive but do not offer comprehensive analysis; spectrometers because of the disproportionate expense to install and maintain, particularly their need for relatively complex sample conditioning systems capable of maintaining acid catalyst samples at a constant temperature. A desired analyzer for acid catalyst should approach or achieve the analytical performance of spectrometers and the comparatively low cost and simplicity of instruments. The above inventory of available instruments and analyzers therefore suggests a dilemma. But the instant inventors have discovered that the dilemma is a false one, the consequence of focusing on the analyzer rather than on the information required.

Analytical Problem

Rather than search for a single analyzer that will perform the required multi-component analysis, the instant inventors have identified the type of information needed to analyze acid catalyst online. This line of thinking led first to the observation that three channels of different or independent information are required. To understand this, consider the case of a univariate instrument whose measured response R₁ varies as a function of changing concentration of acid (A), hydrocarbon (H), and water (W). In a chemical system containing these three components with percent concentrations A, H, and W, an equation for R₁ can be written as follows: R ₁ =a ₁ ·A+h ₁ ·H+w ₁ ·W  (1) where a₁, h₁, and w₁ are the responsivities of the corresponding components in the mixture for the particular instrument. It is axiomatic that a single equation with three unknowns cannot be solved. This fact explains in mathematical terms why univariate instruments that measure density, refractive index, or conductivity have proven inadequate.

The inventors understood that what is needed to solve for A, H, and W is a system of three equations. One might conclude initially that two additional instruments would be required to provide responses required for two additional equations: R ₂ =a ₂ ·A+h ₂ ·H+w ₂ ·W  (2) R ₃ =a ₃ ·A+h ₃ ·H+w ₃ ·W  (3)

However, the instant inventors have recognized that the composition of acid catalyst is mathematically bounded because the concentrations of three components sum to 100%. This means that the chemical system only has two degrees of freedom, suggesting that its composition can be determined through addition of only one more instrument with a response R₂: R ₁ =a ₁ ·A+h ₁ ·H+w ₁ ·W R ₂ =a ₂ ·A+h ₂ ·H+w ₂ ·W  (4) 100=A+H+W

If A, H, and W are known for a set of calibration samples, and if the instrument responses R₁ and R₂ are recorded for those samples, then the constants a_(i), h_(i) and w_(i) can be determined. Subsequently, Equations (4) can be solved for A, H, and W by measuring R₁ and R₂ for an unknown sample.

Characteristics of the Analytical Solution

Equation (4) provides for the substantially complete determination of alkylation catalyst composition with a 2-channel analyzer provided two conditions are met. First, the responsivities a_(i), h_(i), and w_(i) for A, H, and W, respectively, should be sufficiently different so that the solution to the Equation (4) is robust across the applicable range of concentrations for A, H, and W. Second, variation in the responses R₁ and R₂ depend substantially on variation in A, H, and W. If they do not, the implication would be that there is another degree of freedom caused by some chemical or physical effect, e.g., interactions between the components or temperature variation. However, as taught in the above analysis of the Analytical Problem, it has been found that this situation may be addressed by the addition of another instrument whose response uniquely relates to R₁, R₂, and the chemical or physical effect.

The nature of the measurement solution comes into clearer focus if water and dissolved hydrocarbons, including ASO, are viewed as solutes and HF or SA as a solvent. When changes in water concentration are relatively small, then, referring to Eq. (1), the term w₁·W is relatively constant, in which case the chemical system has essentially a single one degree of freedom and Eq. (1) simplifies to R₁=h₁·H+C. Rearranging to express H in terms of R₁ allows H to be measured straightforwardly as a function of density; viscosity; capacitance (a function of a material's dielectric constant); refractive index; absorption of electromagnetic radiation, e.g., microwave, infrared, near-infrared; and/or the emission of radio signals by the sample in a low magnetic field (low-field NMR). However, in practice the term w₁·W in Equation (1) is non-zero and variable in magnitude, explaining why univariate measurement devices used alone have proven incapable of providing full characterization of alkylation catalysts.

Similarly, if the hydrocarbon fraction is constant, a device selective toward water in acid may have a response function across the concentration range relevant to acid catalysts. For example, referring to Equation (2), the Foxboro 871FT toroidal conductivity sensor is used routinely to measure low levels of water in HF with no dissolved hydrocarbons present, i.e., H=0 and the term a₂·A is relatively constant. But in three-component acid catalyst systems the magnitude of the term h₂·H is nonzero and both A and H are variable, with the consequence again that a single-channel instrument does not have a singular response.

Two Degrees of Freedom: Spectral Confirmation

The NIR (Near Infrared) spectrum of HF catalyst (FIG. 1) and NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectrum of SA catalyst (FIG. 2) confirm the overall simplicity of the catalyst systems. As shown in FIG. 1, the NIR spectrum reveals three regions where the expressions of HF, hydrocarbon, and water are distinct if not fully resolved. While this makes direct measurement of intensities difficult, common data treatment and modeling techniques e.g., first derivatives and PLS (Partial Least Squares regression), respectively, permit direct correlation between spectral intensities and concentration. As shown in FIG. 2, the NMR analysis is actually less straightforward, as the spectrum shows only two major sets of peaks because water in SA does not exist as free water, but as a complex with SA. Therefore its concentration in the SA fraction is determined as a function of its effect on the position of the SA peak.

FIG. 3 shows that HF acid catalyst is a three-component system with two degrees of freedom: the amount of water is low and relatively constant while the concentrations of HF and ASO vary as near-perfect mirror images. FIG. 4 further emphasizes that for HF catalyst, the concentrations of acid and ASO relate in a nearly perfect linear fashion.

Hardware: Instruments and Sampling

Turning now to FIG. 5, an embodiment of the present invention, referred to as an Acid Catalyst Analyzer, or ACA, 20, includes a temperature detector 22, an instrument 24, and optionally, one or more other instruments 26, disposed along a fluid flow path 28 as shown. ACA 20 also includes a (e.g., remote) data system (processor) 30 configured to capture and process signals from the temperature detector 22 and instruments 24, 26, etc., apply a model that interprets those signals, and the concentration of the catalyst, e.g., to a conventional alkylation unit control system (not shown).

It should recognized that in some embodiments, an ACA 20 having only a single instrument 24 may be used (e.g., in addition to temperature detector 22), such as for determining the on-line concentration of a single component in the alkylation catalyst mixture flowing through an alkylation process containing, i.e., an acid-soluble-oil (ASO), water, and HF or SA. In such a single-instrument embodiment, instrument 24 is configured to measure a property of the liquid mixture (e.g., acid catalyst) as it flows through fluid flow path 28. It is noted that the response of the particular instrument to concentration changes in one of the three constituents of the liquid mixture is substantially independent of the concentrations of the other constituents. In a particular exemplary embodiment, for example, instrument 24 may include a conductivity detector such as the aforementioned Foxboro 871FT conductivity detector. As discussed herein, it is recognized that conductivity is a response that is related to the concentration of water in the liquid mixture, and is substantially independent of the concentration of acid and ASO.

It should be recognized that instrument 24 may include any one of various other types, such as may be responsive to concentrations of either the acid (HF or SA), the acid-water fraction, or ASO. For example, instrument 24 may be a photometric sensor or photometer, including the above-referenced NIR, FTNIR (Fourier Transform NIR), Raman, and/or NMR spectrometers, and/or water-cut meters (e.g., the Red Eye® 2G Water-Cut Meter by Weatherford International, Ltd., Houston, Tex.). As still another option, instrument 24 may be a density measurement device, such as a Coriolis flowmeter (e.g., Foxboro CFS10 Coriolis flowmeter), which is responsive to changes in acid catalyst density caused by changes in hydrocarbon content. Use of such a density measurement device in a single-instrument embodiment has been shown to provide substantially accurate results for HF and/or SA in acid catalysts in the event the concentration of phase separated isobutane, IB/ps (liquid or gas) remains relatively constant over time. In the event the IB/ps tends to vary significantly, then a separator may be desired, as discussed with respect to the optional variation below.

The data generated by the single instrument 24 (e.g., conductivity detector or other single channel device) and temperature detector (e.g., RTD) 22 may then be used in combination with a model, by processor 30 to determine a temperature compensated concentration of the particular constituent of interest (which in this example is water). (It should be noted that while the temperature detector is shown and described as a device configured to explicitly determine temperature (e.g., an RTD or the like), temperature detector 22 may also include a device or data channel configured to enable implicit capture of temperature information, as will be discussed in greater detail hereinbelow.) Although not required, in particular embodiments, the output generated by processor 30 may be filtered (by optional filter 25) in a manner that would be familiar to those skilled in the art in light of the instant disclosure, such as to provide a smoother output plot of concentration over time, e.g., when IB/ps is present at levels that may cause instantaneous, random variation, giving the appearance of noise in a measured property of acid catalyst.

As mentioned above, in variations of the foregoing embodiments, it may be desirable to provide a second instrument. This second (optional) instrument 26 is configured to measure another property of the liquid mixture, so that the instruments 24 and 26 have mutually distinct responsivities to concentrations of the acid catalyst, ASO, and water. Processor 30 may then capture the data generated by the temperature detector 22 and both instruments 24, 26, and use the data in combination with the model to generate a temperature compensated concentration of the acid, the ASO, and water, in the liquid mixture. In particular embodiments, instrument 24 is a conductivity sensor and instrument 26 measures density.

As a further option, the foregoing embodiments may be provided with a separator 32 configured to remove hydrocarbon (e.g., IB/ps) present in a gas or liquid phase distinct from that of the liquid mixture (acid catalyst) sample stream, which otherwise behaves as a single phase. As shown, separator 32 may be disposed at or upstream of at least one or both of the instruments 24, 26, within fluid flow path 28. In particular embodiments, separator 32 is configured for continuous operation in a conventional manner, e.g., by passing liquid through to the fluid flow path 28, while returning lighter, phase-separated material through a suitable return line, such as shown in FIG. 6. Use of such a separator provides a continuous flow of liquid sample to the instrument(s) and temperature detector, to permit them to operate substantially continuously, i.e., without having to stop the flow of fluid prior to data capture. Alternatively, as will be discussed below with respect to FIG. 7, a separator may be incorporated into one or more of the instruments 24, 26, etc.

As a still further option, the various embodiments disclosed herein may be provided with a heater 33, such as a conventional inline heat exchanger shown schematically in FIG. 5. In particular embodiments, heater 33 may be used simply to help ensure that the liquid mixture entering the ACA from the process at 38 is maintained at or above a predetermined minimum temperature. For example, heater 33 may be particularly useful when the ACA is operated in winter conditions, such as to maintain the liquid mixture at a minimum level predetermined to help prevent dissolution (phase separation) of the liquid mixture during flow through fluid flow path 28. As also shown, it may be desirable to place heater 33 downstream of separator 32, so that IB/ps is removed prior to the application of heat. Heater 33 may also be useful to maintain sample in a temperature range where the response of instrument 24 or 26 to the change in a component concentration provides the required measurement resolution. For example, at water levels relevant to SA alkylation, the change in conductivity, C, as a function of the change of water concentration, W, i.e., dC/dW, is known to increase with temperature. Therefore, a heater 33 incorporated into ACA 20 may be used to heat the acid catalyst sample to a temperature sufficient to provide improved sensitivity to the changing concentration of water in SA without vaporizing light hydrocarbons present in the mixture, e.g., about 40° C. at typical process pressure.

In addition, although heater 33 may be conveniently disposed in line with fluid flow path 28 as shown, substantially any type of heater capable of maintaining the liquid mixture at or above the desired predetermined temperature may be used. For example, in the event the various components of the ACA are disposed within an optional cabinet 52, such as shown in phantom, heater 33 may be a conventional space heater configured to maintain the interior of the cabinet 52 at or above the desired minimum temperature.

It should be recognized that although heater 33 may be used to maintain the liquid mixture within flow path 28 within a predetermined temperature range, or above some minimum temperature, this is not required by the embodiments disclosed herein. Rather, as mentioned above, the present embodiments use one or more temperature detectors (or data channels) 22 in combination with a model at processor 30, in order to provide a temperature compensated output. Thus, these embodiments are configured to provide an output which is not dependent upon maintaining the liquid mixture at a particular temperature as it flows through flow path 28. Rather, these embodiments compensate for substantially any temperature of the liquid mixture, provided the temperature remains within a range predetermined to avoid dissolution at a low end, and excessive gasification, boiling, etc., at a high end.

Turning now to FIG. 6, in an alternate exemplary embodiment, ACA 20′ instruments 24 and 26 are communicably coupled to one or more transmitters 34, 36, configured to capture data from the instruments and to transmit the data to a processor 30 such as a process controller or workstation as shown. In particular embodiments, transmitters 34, 36 may be single or multivariable transmitters of the type available commercially from Invensys Systems, Inc. As also shown, fluid flow path 28 of ACA 20′ is communicably coupled at an upstream end 38 to an alkylation process 40. Fluid flow path 28 is returned to process 40 at a downstream 42 thereof.

The foregoing embodiments may also be provided with various additional aspects that would generally be known to those skilled in the art of fluid process control, such as a blow down inlet and outlet such as shown at 44 and 46, to facilitate cleaning of flow path 28, and a pressure sensor(s) 48 to monitor operating pressures. Also, as mentioned above, separator 32 includes a return 50 configured to return the IB/ps back to process 40, as shown.

Turning now to FIG. 7, in yet another embodiment, an ACA 20″ includes a fluid flow path 28′ that includes parallel legs 60 and 62 that diverge from an upstream end of the flow path 28′, and then reconverge at a downstream end of flow path 28′. The legs 60 and 62 each respectively include a bypass block valve 64 and 66. In this embodiment, the bypass block valves 64 and 66 are configured to periodically open and close in opposite synchronization with one another. This configuration thus periodically stops and starts the flow of the liquid mixture through each leg 60, 62, while the aggregated liquid mixture (i.e., upstream and downstream of the legs) flows substantially continuously.

As also shown, this embodiment enables the use of an instrument 24′, having an integral separator that removes hydrocarbon (e.g., IB/ps) present in a gas or liquid phase distinct from that of the liquid mixture (acid catalyst) sample. This integral separator may thus take advantage of the alternating start/stop fluid flow through leg 60, to effectively provide a self-separation of IB/ps from the acid catalyst sample while flow through leg 60 is stopped. In this regard, the bypass block valve 64 can be configured to stop the fluid flow through leg 60 for long enough to permit the IB/ps to separate from the acid catalyst sample and accumulate within cavity 68 of instrument 24′. The instrument 24′ may then capture data from the acid catalyst 70 (e.g., which collects at a lower portion of cavity 68), before valve 64 opens to re-start fluid flow. The data provided by instrument 24′ may be combined with temperature data from RTD 22 and a model at processor 30 (FIG. 5) as discussed above with respect to ACA 20, to generate concentration values for at least one of the constituents of the alkylation process.

In a particular non-limiting example, instrument 24′ may include a water cut meter, such as the EASZ-1 meter loop powered water cut meter (EESiFlo® North America, Mechanicsburg, Pa. USA), which has been modified in accordance with the teachings of the present invention to include an integral separator in the form of a cavity 68 sized and shaped to enable quantitative accumulation of the aforementioned IB/ps. This ACA 20″ thus provides for convenient removal of IB/ps that may otherwise interfere with property measurement of the liquid mixture using a single instrument 24′, while providing for a temperature compensated determination of a concentration of at least one of the constituents of the acid catalyst.

In a variation of the foregoing embodiment, one or more optional instruments 26′, 26″ may also be used along fluid flow path 28′. For example, an optional instrument 26′ may be located in series with instrument 24′, e.g., within leg 60, or alternatively may be disposed in parallel with instrument 24′, e.g., as shown at 26″ in phantom on leg 62. As a non-limiting example, instrument 26′ may include a Foxboro 871FT toroidal conductivity sensor, while instrument 26″may include a density meter such as the Sarasota™ density meter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Sugar Land, Tex.). It should be recognized, however, that substantially any instrument capable of measuring a property of one or more of the constituents of the liquid mixture as discussed hereinabove, may be used while remaining within the scope of the present invention. It should also be recognized that although embodiments have been shown and described herein as having one or two instruments in addition to a temperature detector, substantially any number (N) of instruments may be provided without departing from the scope of the present invention.

Note that the embodiment of FIG. 6 is similar to that of FIG. 5, while having some additional aspects that may be desirable in some applications, such as to facilitate maintenance thereof. For example, isobutane or hot alkylate may be used to flush HF from the sample flow path, followed by nitrogen blow down to drain for a final purge, in a manner that will be familiar to those skilled in the art, in view of the instant disclosure.

Optional aspects applicable to substantially any of the embodiments discussed herein may also include, but are not limited to, the following:

-   -   Sample shut-off valves to isolate the analyzer system from the         sample fast loop;     -   Inlets (and outlets) for (IC₄) and nitrogen to purge the system         for maintenance following closure of the shut-off valves;     -   Appropriate metallurgy used throughout (e.g., Hastelloy may be         preferred in particular applications, although “Carpenter 20”         alloy may be used for SA service, and low-carbon steel may be         employed for some components used in HF service);     -   A layout such that sample flows from bottom to top so as to         displace sample in the direction that IB/ps tends to migrate         while purging to drain with nitrogen is done from top to bottom         in a fashion consistent with liquid flow under gravity;     -   The system layout should eliminate “low spots” and “hiding         places” where acid can persist during/after purging;     -   A continuous-flow separator 32 to remove IB/ps from the sample         stream, without which inhomogeneous sample flowing through         sensors could cause erratic responses, as discussed above;     -   Optional sample shutoff (SSO) valves (also referred to as Bypass         Block Valves) 64, 66 (FIG. 7) to automatically stop sample flow         at a fixed interval, e.g., as programmed into the ACA controller         30 (employed as an alternative strategy for eliminating erratic         sensor responses caused by IB/ps) to allow IB/ps to float upward         and away from the sensor(s), yielding a single-phase sample);     -   An optional enclosure, such as shown schematically at 52 of         FIGS. 5, 6, to protect ACA components from the elements, e.g.,         with air purge and an HF gas sensor on the outlet (when         measuring HF catalyst);     -   An optional enclosure and/or heater for use when ambient         temperatures may undesirably cool the liquid mixture as         discussed hereinabove;     -   A flow controller, perhaps as simple as an orifice;     -   A pressure sensor 48 (FIGS. 6, 7); and     -   A temperature sensor (or data channel) 22 in the form of a         stand-alone device, one that is integrated into any one or more         of the instruments 24, 26, etc., or in the form of a data         channel of a multi-channel device, used to explicitly or         implicitly generate temperature information for the liquid         mixture.

The following is a non-limiting list of exemplary sensors and properties measured, which may be used in particular embodiments of the present invention:

-   a. Foxboro 871FT (Invensys®) conductivity meter; -   b. Foxboro CFS10 (Invensys®) Coriolis flow meter (density and     temperature; flow is also monitored to provide information about     analyzer operation but is not used in the calculation of acid     composition); -   c. Agar Corporation OW-301 water cut meter (microwave); -   d. Eesiflo International EASZ1 water monitor (dielectric); -   e. K-Patents PR-01-S process refractometer; and -   f. Low-field NMR, i.e., proton resonance frequency <50 MHz.

As discussed herein, instruments 24, 24′, 26, 26′, etc., (and temperature detector 22) have been described in various embodiments as single channel, stand-alone devices. However, it should be recognized that these various instruments and temperature detector may include devices of substantially any type, including multi-channel devices, provided they have one or more data channels which are responsive to concentrations of any one or more constituents of the liquid mixture (e.g., of the acid (HF or SA), the acid-water fraction, and/or ASO) as described herein. For example, multi-channel devices such as the above-referenced NIR, FTNIR (Fourier Transform NIR), NMR, and/or Raman spectrometers, may be used as one or more of the devices 22, 24, 24′, 26, 26′, etc.

For example, with reference back to FIG. 5, in particular embodiments, temperature detector 22 and instrument 24 may take the form of a single multi-channel (e.g., NIR) spectrometer. A gas/liquid separator 32 may be disposed in series with the NIR spectrometer to enable substantially continuous sample flow through flow channel 28 as discussed above. (Similarly, with reference to FIG. 7, temperature detector 22, instrument 24′, and/or instrument 26′ may take the form of a single multi-channel spectrometer modified to include an integral separator in a parallel flow path arrangement as also shown and described hereinabove.) One channel of the spectrometer may thus be configured to serve as detector 22 to generate temperature information for the liquid mixture, while another channel may serve as instrument 24, 24′, etc., to generate information corresponding to concentration of one of the components of the liquid mixture as discussed hereinabove. In a variation of this approach, a third channel of the NIR spectrometer may be used to generate information as described hereinabove with respect to instrument 26, 26′, etc.

Moreover, rather than generating temperature information directly, channel 22 of the spectrometer may be used to generate data corresponding to another aspect of the liquid mixture, so that multiple (e.g., three or more) channels of the spectrometer may be used to gather sufficient information to effectively infer the temperature of the liquid mixture, as described in greater detail hereinbelow. In this manner, the need for directly determining the temperature of the liquid mixture is obviated, e.g., so that channel 22 may be used to gather other useful information. Thus to summarize this example, three channels of the spectrometer correspond to devices 22, 24, and 26, with channel 22 used either for direct (explicit), or indirect (inferential) temperature measurement using the model, as discussed in greater detail hereinbelow.

Improvements Over Conventional Implementations of NIR and NMR

At least three features of the embodiments discussed herein, or practices associated with their implementation, represent significant improvements over established approaches to acid catalyst analysis based on conventional NMR and NIR spectroscopy. First, in particular embodiments, separator 32 (FIGS. 5, 6), removes IB/ps, which permits substantially real-time analysis of continuously flowing sample as discussed hereinabove. In alternate embodiments, such as shown and described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 7, a separator may be incorporated within an instrument such as at 24′, which, in combination with use of a flow path having parallel legs 60, 62, also enables the continuous flow of liquid mixture (e.g., acid catalyst sample). This contrasts with conventional NMR and NIR approaches, which generally require a stationary sample, i.e., periodic, frequent stop-flow to ensure that any IB/ps floats up and clears the sample probe or transmission cell, respectively, where analysis takes place. This incorporation of a separator into the sample flow path thus provides for substantially real-time and continuous sample analysis.

Second, property predictions by the embodiments of the ACA discussed herein are substantially insensitive to variation in sample temperature because responses from a plurality of channels are used to make property models in which temperature is an implicit or explicit variable. Models incorporating responses of instruments 22, 24, 24′, 26, 26′, etc., whose purpose is to follow changes in composition, e.g., the CFS10 (total hydrocarbon) and the 871FT (water), may be used to compensate for temperature implicitly or explicitly, obviating the requirement for sampling systems that ensure presentation of an isothermal sample for analysis.

The apparent simplicity of NIR and NMR spectra belies the complexity of such sample conditioning systems, which may cost up to twice as much as the base spectrometer. The current state of the art in process NMR depends on an isothermal sample. Though not the case with NIR spectroscopy generally, the established approach to NIR analysis of acid catalyst is decidedly isothermal because the property models are isothermal, and samples' spectral responses vary significantly as a function of temperature. Embodiments of the present invention may thus utilize an NIR spectrometer without the need for an isothermal sample, such as by use of NIR models developed as described herein, to compensate for sample temperature implicitly (e.g., inferentially) or explicitly. Embodiments including such a model, in combination with a separator to remove phase-separated isobutane, may dramatically reduce the cost to install and maintain an NIR analyzer system relative to the prior art.

Third, instruments 24, 24′, 26, 26′, etc., (and detectors 22) used in various embodiments of the ACA have core technology that is relatively simple, robust, simple to install, and easy to commission. Installation and commissioning of conventional NIR and NMR systems, including their temperature conditioning approaches, can take weeks. By contrast, the ACA 20, 20′, 20″, etc., has relatively simple installation requirements, while commissioning may typically be completed within two days. Perhaps even more significant, the combined mean-time-before-failure of representative instruments 24 and 26, such as the Invensys® CFS10 Coriolis flowmeter and the Invensys® 871FT conductivity meter is estimated by some to be more than 29 years.

Calibration: Modeling Concentration in Terms of Instrument Responses

As discussed hereinabove in a previous section (Analytical Problem), aspects of the present invention include a two-step process for obtaining concentration values for components in acid catalyst based on instrument responses R₁ and R₂. In general terms, a property P is predicted by applying MODEL _(p) to responses measured on that sample: P= MODEL _(p) ·[R ₁ ,R ₂ ,R ₃ , . . . , R _(N)]  (5) where the responses R₁, R₂, R₃, . . . , R_(N) may be measured on N different single-channel instruments, or on a single N-channel spectrometer. FIG. 8 shows the process in terms of data collected as depicted in Table 2A for the three-channel case, and then analyzed to create a model, which is then applied to the responses R₁, R₂, R₃, . . . , R_(N) measured by the instruments for a sample of unknown composition.

TABLE 2A Example of a calibration data set for a 3-channel analyzer system SAMPLE INFORMATION CHANNEL RESPONSES PROPERTY VALUES (LAB OR ONLINE) Lab ID Date/Time Ch. 1 Ch. 2 Ch. 3 % Acid % Hydrocarbon % Water 1 Day 1 R₁₁ R₂₁ R₃₁ A₁ H₁ W₁ 2 Day 2 R₁₂ R₂₂ R₃₂ A₂ H₂ W₂ 3 Day 3 R₁₃ R₂₃ R₃₃ A₃ H₃ W₃ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n Day n R_(1n) R_(2n) R_(3n) A_(n) H_(n) W_(n)

As used herein, the term “modeling” refers to the process of mathematically relating responses obtained from a plurality of response channels to the known chemical composition of calibration samples, the result being a “model.” As used herein, the term “model” is not limited in form to a system of linear equations such as depicted in Equations (4) or (5), nor is it limited to use of responses R₁, R₂ from only two instruments. Rather, “model” refers to any equation or a system of equations, which may include multiple terms for variables (parameters) measured by the embodiments shown and described herein, and which alone or in combination predict one or more of the component properties (concentrations) of interest.

Calibration: Explicit and Implicit Temperature Compensation

Furthermore, models may be developed so as to be capable of accurately predicting properties even when variation in sample temperature has a direct effect on one or more inputs R_(i) apart from e.g., a component concentration change. Referring to Equations (1), (2), and (3), this would mean that one or more values d(a_(i))/dT, d(h_(i))/dT, and d(w_(i))/dT are nonzero. In one approach, predictions can be made insensitive to temperature by employing responses R_(i) from three or more single-channel instruments, or from an N-channel spectrometer (N≧3). If Equation (4) is understood to apply under isothermal conditions (dT=0), then Equation (6) illustrates the addition of a third device to deal implicitly with the additional degree of freedom resulting from temperature variation (the boundary condition A+H+W=100 still applies): R ₁ =a ₁ ·A+h ₁ ·H+w ₁ ·W R ₂ =a ₂ ·A+h ₂ ·H+w ₂ ·W  (6) R ₃ =a ₃ ·A+h ₃ ·H+w ₃ ·W

Provided that R₁, R₂, and R₃ relate substantially uniquely to T, and adequate variation exists among all coefficients a_(i), h_(i), or w_(i), a suitable multivariable modeling method such as PLS, can be used to obtain models that provide predictions for A, H, and W as depicted in Equation (5), which are substantially insensitive to temperature variation. This can be termed passive or implicit temperature compensation.

In explicit or active temperature compensation, models are developed which incorporate temperature as a measured variable. Equation (7) is an alternative way to express the relationship between the concentrations of interest and measured responses, with temperature (T) being an explicit variable (the boundary condition applying still): A=a′ ₁ ·R ₁ +a′ ₂ ·R ₂ +t _(A) ·T H=h′ ₁ ·R ₁ +h′ ₂ ·R ₂ +t _(H) ·T  (7) W=w′ ₁ ·R ₁ +w′ ₂ ·R ₂ +t _(W) ·T where T, t_(A), t_(H), and t_(W) have been substituted for R₃, a′₃, h′₃, and w′₃, respectively. Thus, whether models incorporate temperature implicitly or explicitly, the development of N property models for a determined system where A+H+W=100 requires a minimum of N measured parameters. Calibration: Characteristics of the Data Set

At least three observations about samples and property values should be noted concerning the calibration sample set and the calibration process.

-   -   Concentration Ranges. In particular embodiments, the sample set         should include samples whose composition spans the full range of         relevant property values that the process will exhibit and the         analyzer will be required to analyze.     -   Sample Composition. To the extent practical, the sample set in         particular embodiments should also have all possible         combinations of component concentrations.     -   Temperature Range. When the goal is to develop models that         provide substantially accurate predictions when temperature         varies, calibration samples should generally span the full range         of temperatures of interest manner that is not correlated with         composition.     -   Data Modeling. Calibration involves the statistical reduction of         data for a population of samples. Accordingly, multivariable         statistical modeling methods such as MLR (multiple linear         regression) or PLS (partial least squares), and/or other         modeling methods known to those skilled in the art may be used.

Additional Considerations Related to Representative Implementation

The following are practices related to the implementation of various embodiments of the ACA.

Calibration of Sensors

The above-referenced CFS10 flowmeter, the 871FT conductivity sensor, or any other sensor used in the ACA embodiments hereof will not be required to report percent acid, percent water, or percent organic (e.g., ASO) directly. Instead, the “raw” responses from the instrument will be used both for the creation of property models and for routine composition prediction using those models. Thus, signals from the instruments are gathered into a common data handling device (e.g., processor 30) where models are applied to predict percent (%) acid, percent (%) hydrocarbon, and percent (%) water.

Generation of Reference Values for Modeling

The property (lab) values noted may come from a variety of sources. A traditional analysis approach may be used, which includes obtaining samples and testing them in the laboratory by a conventional (e.g., manual) test method. Alternatively, for development purposes, it may be possible to use data captured from current installations that employ spectrometric analyzers. These data may be used to calibrate embodiments of the present invention.

Temperature as an Analytical Variable

As mentioned hereinabove, conventional process spectrometer systems employed for the analysis of acid catalyst, i.e., NIR(HF) and NMR(SA) commonly are designed to control sample temperature. It has been generally understood that such control was required in order ensure reproducibility of samples' spectral response, which are known generally to exhibit variation as a function of temperature. Similarly, as also mentioned above, the various devices incorporated into embodiments of the present invention may also have some temperature dependency. As such, it should be recognized that the embodiments hereof may also include such conventional sample temperature control.

However, as also discussed above, particular embodiments of the present invention avoid the need for such temperature control by providing for temperature compensation. This temperature compensation may be provided by capturing the temperature either explicitly or implicitly. For example, temperature may be captured explicitly using temperature detector 22 (FIGS. 5-7), and/or by using temperature capture/compensation technology commonly incorporated into various instruments 24, 26, etc. (In this regard, for example, in addition to flow and density, the above-referenced CFS10 Coriolis flowmeter also reports sample temperature.) Embodiments of the present invention may thus include temperature as a measured variable (e.g., a data channel) via stand-alone temperature detector 22. This temperature information may then be used with the aforementioned data model, to compensate for temperature-dependent changes in responses/data provided by the other instruments (e.g., the other data channels).

Alternatively, as also discussed above, sample temperature may be captured implicitly, such as by providing a sufficient number of substantially mutually distinct data channels (e.g., three or more for the acid catalysts described hereinabove) provided by various instruments used in combination, and/or by the use of multi-channel devices such as the aforementioned spectrometers.

Regardless of which of these approaches are used, the various embodiments of the present invention may use this direct or inferred temperature information to compensate for the particular temperature of the liquid mixture, to reduce or substantially eliminate the requirement for sample conditioning (i.e., isothermal temperature control) such as commonly used with spectrometric analyzers.

Validation

After modeling, the accuracy of predictions made by the ACA 20, 20′, 20″, etc., with the model may be validated through the process depicted in FIG. 9.

The standard deviation on the difference between Lab and Predicted values, Stdev(D), is sometimes referred to as SEP (Standard Error of Prediction) or RMSEP (root mean square error of prediction). SEP is simply a measure of agreement between the Lab and Predicted values. Insofar as both the predicted values and the Lab values have associated uncertainties, the name SEP implies inappropriately that the differences are due to errors in the predicted values only, whereas reference values invariably have associated errors and therefore may be referred to simply as SE (standard error).

Additional Considerations ReVAP and Alkad Additive Systems HF Alkylation

The analytical problem may become more complex if yet another component, e.g., an additive such as per the ReVAP™ or Alkad™ processes (UOP, LLC, Des Plaines, Ill.) is added into the catalyst, such as to reduce HF volatility. In these and other applications involving additional components or additives, embodiments of the invention as discussed herein may be used substantially as described, or with various modifications made to facilitate their use. For example, an ACA system 20 and/or 20′ (FIGS. 5, 6) may be provided with two instruments 24, 26. Instrument 24 may include a conductivity sensor such as the aforementioned Foxboro 871FT conductivity sensor. Instrument 26 may include a Raman spectrometer, e.g., connected via fiber optics to the sample flow path 28. The Raman spectrometer 26 may be used in conjunction with a gas/liquid separator 32, or with a bifurcated sample flow path and bypass block valve 66 (FIG. 7) to enable substantially continuous sample flow as discussed hereinabove. A temperature detector 22 may be included as a discrete component (as shown), or provided inferentially by the Raman spectrometer as discussed hereinabove. Alternatively, a discrete temperature detector may be integrated into any one of various instruments 24, 26, etc. In this regard, as an optional variation of this approach, another instrument 26 may be used, such as a flowmeter (e.g., the Foxboro CFS10 Coriolis flowmeter discussed hereinabove), which includes an integral temperature detector. As further options, one or more pressure sensors 48 may be provided, such as shown and described with respect to FIG. 6.

In these exemplary configurations, the conductivity sensor 24 and the Raman spectrometer 26 may be used as described herein to conveniently analyze a conventional HF catalyst which may include: HF (roughly 82%-95%); Acid Soluble Oil (ASO) (5%-15%); and water (0.5%-2%). HF and ASO may thus be measured by the Raman spectrometer (using the model/processor 30); and water may be measured using the conductivity sensor. Process temperature measured by detector 22 would enable the measurements of HF and ASO to be conveniently compensated for temperature.

These embodiments may also be used to analyze more complex systems in which one or more additional components (such as with ReVAP or Alkad processes) are added to the fluid mixture. For example, a conventional ReVAP HF catalyst system includes HF, ASO, water, and an additive (e.g., sulfolane). So while the conductivity sensor 24 may be used to measure water, the remaining components (HF, ASO, and the sulfolane additive) may be measured using the Raman spectrometer 26 in combination with the model/processor 30. Thus, in both cases, i.e., those with and without additional components, the water may be measured by use of the conductivity sensor 24, while the Raman spectrometer may be used to measure the balance of the components in the acid catalyst mixture. In other words, in each case, the conductivity sensor provides a response that can be correlated with water concentration. And in each case, the Raman spectrum contains distinct responses that correlate directly with the other components in the sample: HF and ASO; and in the case of the ReVAP and Alkad processes, the additive.

It is noted that the Raman spectrum has distinct responses for all components of these processes except water. Water has essentially no Raman signal and is thus measured by conductivity as discussed above. Thus, rather than depending on a conventional statistical modeling methodology, this Raman-based analyzer system may be calibrated with relatively few samples. Moreover, it is noted that these embodiments do not rely on conventional active temperature control to carefully maintain the process fluid at predetermined temperatures during analysis. Rather, the model 30 used by embodiments of the present invention as described hereinabove effectively compensates for temperature variations when calculating concentrations. In this regard, while the conductivity measurement varies in accordance with temperature, this measurement is substantially independent of the concentrations of the other components of the sample. This aspect, in combination with the Raman spectrometer's relative insensitivity to temperature variation, tends to facilitate this temperature compensation approach, to thus obviate the need for the conventional temperature control associated with the aforementioned NIR, FTNIR, and NMR approaches.

It should be recognized that conventional temperature controlled NIR, FTNIR, etc., may be used to measure components in an HF alkylation catalyst having additives associated with the ReVAP and Alkad approaches. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that conventional approaches for developing NIR property models for these catalyst-plus-additive samples may be sufficiently cumbersome and/or inaccurate as to make NIR impractical for such applications. In this regard, conventional laboratory analysis of catalyst composition may be insufficiently accurate to sustain the statistically-based PLS modeling methodology described above. Moreover, although models may be available for some additive-containing samples, a new model would generally need to be developed when a new additive is used. So while conventional model development approaches may be used to enable use of NIR, FTNIR, etc., for samples having additives, these approaches may be relatively impractical.

Alternative Applications

Embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein as particularly useful in alkylation processes, e.g., due to the benefits of higher accuracy relative to solitary instruments, and lower price and ease of use vs general purpose spectrometric analyzers. However, it should be recognized that these embodiments more broadly provide a multi-channel multi-variable analyzer, e.g., by the integration of two or more disparate instruments into a system, and/or by the use of temperature compensation rather than temperature conditioning, that provides many of the benefits of a multi-channel spectrometer in a generally simpler, more robust, and cost effective manner, which may lend itself to creation and application of models using techniques similar to those applied in quantitative spectrometry.

Embodiments of the present invention may be used to analyze any number of hydrocarbon streams, including substantially any hydrocarbon stream associated with alkylation processes. Moreover, referring now to FIGS. 10-14, alternate embodiments of the present invention are shown and described which may be used to analyze any one or more hydrocarbon streams associated with a hydrocarbon process 40.

As shown in FIG. 10, a process control system 175 includes an analyzer 120 such as one or more of the various analyzers 20, 20′, 20″ disclosed hereinabove, in combination with a multivariable predictive model control module (PCM) 80 capable of automatic manipulation of multiple parameters associated with the hydrocarbon process 40.

Control module 80 may be a conventional predictive model module embodied in a processor running software such as the Connoisseur™ software application/platform commercially available from Invensys Systems, Inc. (Foxboro, Mass.) for use in advanced process control applications. This application/platform may be used in a conventional manner to develop and run a dynamic model of the process 40 and to configure a multivariable control strategy including control targets, constraints, manipulated variables and disturbance variables, etc.

In these alternate embodiments, control module 80 may use a conventional multivariable model of the particular hydrocarbon process 40. The real time hydrocarbon stream analysis provided by the analyzer 120 is thus fed to the control module 80 to permit automatic, real time (e.g., substantially simultaneous) manipulation of multiple parameters that affect the process 40. Module 80 is thus configured to receive the various real-time outputs of analyzer 120 to generate outputs configured to maintain operation of the hydrocarbon process 40 at optimal levels of performance. For example, the constraint control capabilities of multivariable model predictive control module 80 may use the real time output generated by an analyzer 20, 20′, 20″ monitoring a process 40 such as an alkylation unit to run close to minimum acid strength while avoiding “acid runaway” as discussed above.

Turning now to FIG. 11, a variation of process control system 175 is shown at 275, in which an analyzer 220 may include modules specifically configured to analyze particular hydrocarbon streams associated with process 40, including both acid catalyst and alkylation process streams. For example, as shown, the analyzer 220 may include both acid catalyst and alkylation stream modules 82 and 84, each in the form of one of the analyzers 20, 20′, 20″ described hereinabove. Modules 82 and 84 may thus be configured to independently analyze streams from acid catalyst and alkylation units 86, 88, respectively, of hydrocarbon process 40.

Turning to FIG. 12, in another variation, a process control system 375 is substantially similar to system 175, using an analyzer 320 in the form of an analyzer 20 described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 5, using a (e.g., Raman, NIR, FTNIR, or substantially any other) spectrometer as temperature detector 22 and instrument 24, to analyze a plurality of hydrocarbon streams associated with a hydrocarbon process 40. Multiple spectrometers may be used to provide substantially simultaneous analysis of the various hydrocarbon streams, or in particular embodiments, the streams may be multiplexed to a single spectrometer as shown.

In the particular example shown, the spectrometer is configured to analyze hydrocarbon streams associated with an alkylation process. The particular exemplary hydrocarbon streams shown include: (1) olefin feed stream such as ethylene, propylene, butylene, isobutylene, etc. (depending on feed source) with small amounts of non-olefinic hydrocarbons and water; (2) isobutane feed with some “impurities” of propane and normal butane; (3) isobutane recycle with a range of “impurities” most notably propane and normal butane; (4) normal butane product with “lost” isobutane and alkylate; (5) depropanizer bottoms to detect propane “impurity”; and (6) alkylate product to determine RVP (Reid Vapor Pressure) and possibly other qualities. More specific examples of the contents of these streams that may be analyzed by system 375 are shown in FIG. 13.

Process control system 475 of FIG. 14 is substantially similar to system 375, while also analyzing an acid catalyst stream (e.g., HF or SA) associated with hydrocarbon process 40, 140 as shown.

It should be recognized that the various hydrocarbon streams may be coupled to the analyzers 120, 220, 320 in any convenient manner, such as via fiber optic links coupled to one or more fluid flow paths (28, 28′, FIGS. 5, 7) physically disposed within process 40, 140, as discussed above. Alternatively, individual sensors or spectrometers associated with the analyzer(s) may be physically coupled to the fluid flow path(s) and communicably coupled to portions of the analyzer(s) and/or PCM(s) that may be disposed remotely from the hydrocarbon process. In this regard, it is noted that as shown in the embodiments of FIGS. 12 and 14, the analyzer(s) and/or PCM 80 (or components thereof) may be installed in a control room or other general purpose environment, along with a monitor or other computer display/user interface to enable operators to view operation thereof, while the fluid flow paths of the analyzer(s) may be disposed along with process 40, 140, in an area designated hazardous as shown. Alternatively, the analyzer(s) and/or PCMs may be disposed within the designated hazardous area, e.g., within packaging suitable to meet hazardous area classification requirements.

As also shown, the process control systems 175, 275, 375 and 475 provide for bi-directional communication between the PCM 80 and the hydrocarbon process 40. This communication link provides for closed-loop feedback to modify the operating parameters of the process 40 in response to the analyzer output as discussed hereinabove. In addition, in particular embodiments, this communication link may be used by the PCM 80 to capture additional data associated with process 40, e.g., to enable further optimization of process 40. Non-limiting examples of such additional parameters, beyond those obtained by the analyzer 120, 220, 320, may include reactor temperature and reactor pressure. Still further parameters may be calculated by the PCM 80 using captured data, such as isobutane to olefin ratio, isobutane recycle purity, and acid strength. These parameters may then be used by the predictive modeling capabilities of PCM 80 to provide outputs to the process 40, 140 in real time to improve the operational efficiency, such as by operating the process 40, 140 closer to optimum reactor temperatures, pressure, isobutane to olefin ratio and isobutane recycle purity, etc. Some representative examples of outputs to process 40, 140, include signals to: (1) increase or decrease reactor temperature setpoints; (2) increase or decrease reactor pressure; and (3) increase or decrease new acid input to control acid strength.

These embodiments are thus configured to provide substantially continuous, real time feedback to the process of each of the controlled operating parameters from the various measurements and/or properties inferred therefrom. In this regard, it is noted that acid strength generally cannot be determined inferentially, so the continuous, online acid catalyst measurement capability provided by the analyzers 20, 20′, 20″, advantageously enables this operating parameter to be managed, e.g., in real time using PCM 80.

It should also be noted that in any of the embodiments of FIGS. 10-14, the analyzers 120, 220, 320 may include an optional instrument 26, such as the aforementioned conductivity sensor, capable of determining the content of water within any of the various hydrocarbon streams associated with process 40, 140. The water content may then be used by PCM 80 in the calculation of parameter adjustments communicated to process 40, 140.

Although some exemplary inputs and outputs to and from PCM 80 are shown and described, it should be recognized that embodiments of the present invention are not limited thereby. Rather, substantially any parameter associated with a particular hydrocarbon process may be captured by suitable sensors and fed via communication link to PCM 80 without departing from the scope of the present invention. Similarly, substantially any parameter may be outputted by PCM 80 and fed back to the process 40, 140, such as to optimize the operation thereof. These inputs and outputs may vary, depending on the particular application. Additional examples of various inputs and outputs, which may be used in substantially any combination, are included in the following Tables 2B and 2C, respectively.

TABLE 2B Inputs 1. Isobutane/olefin ratio 2. Isobutane feed drum level 3. Isobutane make-up purity 4. Olefin feed drum level 5. Olefin feed purity 6. Acid water content 7. Acid ASO content 8. Reactor temperature 9. Reactor inlet pressure 10. Recycle Surge Drum level 11. nC₄ content of isobutane recycle 12. C₃ content of isobutane recycle 13. Depropanizer reflux accumulator pressure 14. Pressure measurement at the vapour phase at the bottoms of the depropanizer 15. Pressure differential measurement across the depropanizer column 16. isobutane in C₃ purge 17. Temperature measurement between the top feed entry and overhead product of the isostripper (deisobutanizer) 18. Temperature measurement between top and middle feed of the isostripper 19. Temperature measurement between the middle and bottom feed of the isostripper 20. Pressure differential measurement across the isostripper 21. Temperature measurement between the bottom feed and reboiler return in the isostripper 22. Pressure differential measurement across the debutanizer column 23. Temperature measurements in the debutanizer column between the feed and the overhead 24. Temperature measurement between the reboiler return and the feed to the debutanizer column 25. isobutane in nC₄ product 26. Alkylate RVP upstream of alkylate storage tank 27. Alkylate MON upstream of alkylate storage tank 28. Alkylate RON upstream of alkylate storage tank 29. Alkylate product flow rate

TABLE 2C Outputs 1. Olefin Feed Rate 2. Isobutane Feed Rate 3. Isobutane Recycle Rate 4. Spent Acid flow to Regeneration 5. Fresh Acid make-up 6. Process water make-up 7. Refrigerant Flash Drum pressure (applicable to SA) 8. C₃ purge flow 9. Depropanizer reflux flow 10. Steam or heating source to depropanizer reboiler 11. Steam or heating source to isostripper reboiler 12. nC₄ side draw or debutanizer reflux ratio 13. Steam or heating source to debuanizer reboiler 14. iC₄ recycle composition control for nC4 content and/or C3 content 15. iC₄ inventory control 16. Feed drums level control 17. Isostripper control, to reduce iC₄ losses and nC₄ accumulation 18. Depropanizer Control to reduce iC4 losses 19. Debutanizer Control to reduce alkylate losses 20. Alkylate RVP control

Embodiments of the present invention, such as shown in FIGS. 10-14, may thus provide real-time, continuous, online analysis of alkylation unit streams and use this analysis to optimize alkylation unit operation. This real-time, continuous, online analysis is provided on multiple measurement channels to provide information which is comparable to that conventionally provided by multiple GCs (Gas Chromatography systems) and the like, without the associated maintenance difficulties. The various components used in these embodiments are based on technology which has been proven in demanding chemical manufacturing processes. Moreover, the instant embodiments enable analysis to be performed continuously, e.g., with continuous sample flow, to eliminate the drawbacks of conventional stop-flow analysis, without the need for relatively expensive and complex temperature conditioning equipment. The online analysis provided by these embodiments also substantially eliminates the inherent delay and potential handling hazards associated with conventional off-line sampling and laboratory testing of hydrocarbon stream samples containing caustic materials such as HF. Additional benefits of the various embodiments shown and described herein may include: reduction of iC4 losses; reduction of iC4 import; increased Alkylate production; decreased Energy Consumption; relatively stable operation; reliable protection of reactor constraints; and/or reduction of operator workload.

An example of another application that may benefit from embodiments of the present invention may include one that is related to operation of HF alkylation units. This application concerns control of an HF regeneration tower (a distillation unit that pushes high-purity HF overhead and leaves water and polymer/ASO at the bottom in the form of a residue for disposal). The objective of this distillation unit is to remove as much HF out of the residue as possible to minimize the need for caustic materials to neutralize any remaining HF in the residue prior to disposal (e.g., incineration).

The residue may thus be pumped through the embodiments of, for example, FIGS. 5 and 6, to measure percent (%) organic, percent (%) HF, and percent (%) water. In this manner, operation of the distillation unit may be continued until the percent (%) HF reaches a sufficiently low level.

Having described various embodiments of the present invention, exemplary methods of operation will now be described in connection with the following Tables 3 and 4.

Referring to Table 3, an exemplary method is provided for on-line concentration determination of components in a liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing through an alkylation process, i.e., substantially any mixture which includes hydrocarbons. The method includes supplying 100 the liquid mixture to an instrument configured to have responsivities to concentrations of one of the components (e.g., acid, ASO, and water), independently of the concentrations of the components. The liquid mixture is supplied 102 to a temperature detector, and supplied 103 to a second instrument. A property of the liquid mixture is measured with the first instrument at 104 and with the second instrument at 105, and temperature data is generated at 106. Property and temperature data is captured at 108, and a processor uses the data and a model of responsivities to various concentrations of the components, to determine 109 a temperature compensated concentration of at least one of the components in the liquid mixture. At 110, the temperature compensated concentration of components is inputted to a process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process; and at 111, the PCM generates at least one output configured to affect operation of, and to be receivable by, the hydrocarbon process.

TABLE 3 100 supplying the liquid mixture to an instrument; 102 supplying the liquid mixture to a temperature detector; 103 supplying the liquid mixture to a second instrument 104 measuring a property of the liquid mixture using the instrument; 105 measuring a property of the liquid mixture using the second instrument 106 generating temperature data for the liquid mixture using the temperature detector; 108 capturing, with a processor, data generated by the instrument and temperature detector; 109 determining, with the processor, using the data in combination with a model, a temperature compensated concentration of at least one of the components; 110 the temperature compensated concentration of components is inputted to a process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process; and 111 PCM generates at least one output configured to affect operation of, and to be receivable by, the hydrocarbon process.

Optional aspects of the foregoing method are described in connection with Table 4. As shown, the temperature compensated concentration is filtered at 112. A spectrometer (e.g., Raman) is optionally used as the instrument at 114. At 116, the liquid mixture is optionally supplied to an other instrument, in which the instruments are configured to have mutually distinct responsivities to concentrations of the components, and both instruments are used by the processor to determine temperature compensated concentration of at least two constituents of the liquid mixture. A conductivity measurement device is optionally used as the other instrument at 118. Hydrocarbons separated from the bulk acid catalyst as a distinct phase (liquid or gas) are optionally removed 120 from liquid sample mixture prior to using the instrument for property analysis, optionally while the liquid mixture is conveyed substantially continuously in a downstream direction. Optionally, at 121, the instruments and temperature detector are configured as a multi-channel (e.g., Raman) spectrometer, having at least three channels, e.g., for generating information corresponding to three mutually distinct parameters of the liquid mixture, for explicit or inferential temperature detection of the liquid mixture. The separating is effected using an alternating stop flow via parallel flow paths at 122. The liquid mixture is obtained from an acid catalyst stream in a hydrocarbon conversion process, including either HF or SA at 124. A model is used at 126 which includes a model data set of expected outputs from the instruments under a plurality of known concentrations of acid, ASO, water, and optionally, an additive.

TABLE 4 112 temperature compensated concentration is filtered 114 Instrument is a spectrometer 116 liquid mixture is optionally supplied to an other instrument 118 Other instrument is a conductivity measurement device 120 Phase-separated hydrocarbons optionally separated from liquid mixture prior to using the instrument(s), optionally while the liquid mixture is conveyed substantially continuously downstream 121 Optionally, the instruments and temperature detector are configured in the form of a multi-channel Raman spectrometer, having at least three channels, e.g., configured for generating information corresponding to three mutually distinct parameters of the liquid mixture, for explicit or inferential temperature detection of the liquid mixture. 122 separating effected using alternating stop flow via parallel flow paths 124 liquid mixture obtained from an HF or SA acid catalyst stream in a hydrocarbon conversion process 126 Model used includes model data set of expected outputs from the instruments under a plurality of known concentrations of acid, ASO, water, and optionally, an additive.

It should be recognized that in the foregoing embodiments, instruments 24, 24′ 26, and 26′, etc., may be incorporated into a single device, provided they have mutually distinct responsivities to concentrations of the various components of the liquid mixture. So for example, these instruments may include a single NMR or NIR spectrometer capable of detecting multiple responses to one or more stimuli, and whose sampling system is configured with a sensor to measure the sample temperature, which may be used to compensate for temperature variation in the case where the sampling system is not designed to control sample temperature. Alternatively, the sampling system does not actively control sample temperature, but instead a calibration data set such as that described in Table 2 is acquired across a wide range of temperatures T_(n) such that the effect of temperature on responses R₁, R₂, R₃, . . . , R_(n) is represented in the calibration data set across a range of relevant temperatures to permit acid, ASO, and water to be modeled without direct application of a correction for measured temperature.

It should also be recognized that although the various embodiments hereof have been shown and described as suitable for online use, e.g., by direct connection to an alkylation process, these embodiments may also be used in an offline mode without departing from the scope of the present invention.

It should be noted that the various modules and other components of the embodiments discussed hereinabove, including processor 30, may be configured as hardware, as computer readable code stored in any suitable computer usable medium, such as ROM, RAM, flash memory, phase-change memory, magnetic disks, etc., and/or as combinations thereof, without departing from the scope of the present invention.

It should be understood that any of the features described with respect to one of the embodiments described herein may be similarly applied to any of the other embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of the present invention.

In the preceding specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.

The above systems are implemented in various computing environments. For example, the present invention may be implemented on a conventional IBM PC or equivalent, multi-nodal system (e.g., LAN) or networking system (e.g., Internet, WWW, wireless web), and/or conventional process control network. All programming and data related thereto are stored in computer memory, static or dynamic or non-volatile, and may be retrieved by the user in any of: conventional computer storage, display (e.g., CRT, flat panel LCD, plasma, etc.) and/or hardcopy (i.e., printed) formats. The programming of the present invention may be implemented by one skilled in the art of computer systems and/or software design. 

1. A process control system for closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process having at least one liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing therethrough, which liquid hydrocarbon mixture includes an unknown concentration of components including hydrocarbons, said system comprising: an analyzer having a fluid flow path configured to convey the liquid mixture continuously in a downstream direction from the hydrocarbon process, the analyzer including: an instrument disposed along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring a property of the liquid mixture, the instrument configured to have responsivities to concentrations of one of the components, substantially independent of the concentrations of others of the components; a temperature detector configured to generate temperature data for the liquid mixture; a model of responsivities to various concentrations of the components at various temperatures; and a processor configured to capture data generated by the temperature detector and the instrument, and to use the data in combination with said model to determine a temperature compensated concentration of said components in said liquid mixture while the liquid mixture flows continuously through the fluid flow path; a process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process, the PCM communicably coupled to the analyzer and being communicably couplable to the hydrocarbon process; and the PCM configured to receive the temperature compensated concentration from the analyzer as an input to the process model, and to generate at least one output configured to affect operation of, and receivable by, the hydrocarbon process, the process control system further comprising a filter module communicably coupled to said processor, said filter configured to mathematically filter said temperature compensated concentration.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon process comprises an alkylation process.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the hydrocarbon process comprises an acid catalyst process.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the analyzer comprises an acid catalyst analyzer.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the PCM is configured to receive the temperature compensated concentration from the analyzer and to generate the at least one output substantially in real-time.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the instrument comprises a single-channel instrument.
 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the instrument comprises a spectrometer.
 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the instrument comprises a Raman spectrometer.
 9. The system of claim 1, comprising: another instrument disposed along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring another property of the liquid mixture; and the instrument and the other instrument configured to have mutually distinct responsivities to concentrations of the components.
 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the components of the liquid hydrocarbon mixture include water.
 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon process includes a plurality of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures, and the analyzer is configured to determine the temperature compensated concentration of components in each of the plurality of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the analyzer is configured to multiplex the plurality of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures to sequentially determine the temperature compensated concentration of components thereof.
 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the analyzer is configured to determine the temperature compensated concentration of components of liquid mixture streams selected from the group consisting of acid catalyst, olefin feed, IC4 makeup, IC4 recycle, nC4 side-draw, depropanizer bottoms, and alkylate streams, and combinations thereof.
 14. The system of claim 11, wherein at least one of the plurality of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures comprises an acid catalyst for hydrocarbon conversion including unknown concentrations of an acid, an acid-soluble-oil (ASO), and water.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the liquid hydrocarbon mixture further comprises one or more additive.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the additive comprises sulfolane.
 17. The system of claim 9, wherein at least one of said instruments comprises a conductivity measurement device.
 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the instruments are configured to have mutually distinct responsivities to concentrations of an acid, ASO, water, an additive; and wherein the processor is configured to capture data generated by the temperature detector and the instruments and to use the data in combination with the model to generate a temperature compensated concentration of the acid, the ASO, the water, and the additive, in said liquid mixture.
 19. The system of claim 9, wherein said instrument comprises a Raman spectrometer, and said other instrument comprises a conductivity sensor.
 20. The system of claim 19, comprising a third instrument disposed along said fluid flow path.
 21. The system of claim 20, wherein said third instrument comprises a flowmeter.
 22. The system of claim 20, wherein said third instrument comprises a density measurement device.
 23. The system of claim 19, wherein said fluid flow path is configured to convey the liquid mixture in a downstream direction from the process to the instrument, and said fluid flow path comprises a separator disposed upstream of the first instrument, the separator configured to remove hydrocarbon present in a gas or liquid phase distinct from that of the liquid mixture, wherein the fluid flow path is configured to convey the liquid mixture continuously to the first instrument.
 24. The system of claim 23, wherein said Raman spectrometer comprises multiple channels configured for generating information corresponding to mutually distinct parameters of the liquid mixture.
 25. The system of claim 1, wherein the temperature detector comprises the instrument configured to determine the temperature of the liquid mixture inferentially.
 26. The system of claim 1, wherein the fluid flow path comprises parallel legs and the continuously flowing liquid mixture alternates between said legs.
 27. The system of claim 1, comprising one or more other instruments configured for measuring one or more other properties of the liquid mixture.
 28. The system of claim 27, wherein the one or more other instruments are selected from the group consisting of: pH probes; ion-selective electrodes; viscometers; refractive index probes; beta gauges; densitometers; conductivity meters; photometers; flow meters; water cut measurement instruments; temperature probes (RTDs); NIR detectors; FTNIR detectors; filter-based NIR photometers; UV (ultra-violet) detectors; Raman spectrometers; NMR spectrometers; water-cut meters; and combinations thereof.
 29. The system of claim 9, wherein the temperature detector is disposed on at least one of the instruments.
 30. The system of claim 1, wherein said model comprises a model data set of expected outputs from the first and second instruments when measuring liquid samples having a plurality of known concentrations of acid, acid-soluble-oil (ASO), and water.
 31. The system of claim 30, wherein said model comprises a model data set of expected outputs from the first and second instruments when measuring liquid samples having a plurality of known concentrations of acid, acid-soluble-oil (ASO), water, and an additive.
 32. The system of claim 3, wherein acid in said acid catalyst comprises hydrofluoric acid (HF) acid.
 33. The system of claim 3, wherein acid in said acid catalyst comprises sulfuric acid (SA).
 34. A process control system for closed-loop control of a hydrocarbon process having at least one liquid hydrocarbon mixture flowing therethrough, which liquid hydrocarbon mixture includes an unknown concentration of at least three components including hydrocarbons and water, said system comprising: a fluid flow path configured to convey the liquid mixture continuously in a downstream direction therethrough; a Raman spectrometer disposed along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring a first property of the liquid mixture; a separator disposed upstream of the Raman spectrometer along the fluid flow path, the separator configured to remove hydrocarbon present in a gas or liquid phase distinct from that of the liquid mixture, wherein the liquid mixture is conveyed continuously through the Raman spectrometer; the Raman spectrometer being configured to have responsivities to concentration of at least one of the components, substantially independent of the concentration of the water; the Raman spectrometer and the conductivity sensor configured to have mutually distinct responsivities to levels of the components; a model of responsivities to various levels of the components at various temperatures; a processor configured for capturing data generated by the Raman spectrometer and conductivity sensor and using the data in combination with said model to determine temperature compensated levels of the properties in the liquid mixture while the liquid mixture flows continuously through the fluid flow path; a process control module (PCM) including a process model of the hydrocarbon process, the PCM communicably coupled to the analyzer and being communicably couplable to the hydrocarbon process; and the PCM configured to receive the temperature compensated concentration from the analyzer as an input to the process model, and to generate at least one output configured to affect operation of, and receivable by, the hydrocarbon process, a filter module communicably coupled to said processor, said filter configured to mathematically filter said temperature compensated concentration.
 35. The system of claim 34, comprising a conductivity sensor disposed along the fluid flow path, and configured for measuring conductivity of the liquid mixture. 